Paranthropus robustus
Adapted from Wikipedia · Adventurer experience
Physical Characteristics
Paranthropus robustus had a very strong skull and powerful jaws. This helped them chew tough foods. Males were bigger than females. They could climb trees and walk on two legs.
Diet and Behavior
These ancient humans probably ate plants from open grasslands. They may have also eaten fruits, roots, honey, and termites. There is evidence they used bones as tools to help prepare their food.
Habitat and Predators
They lived in areas with both open fields and wooded lands. Big animals like sabertooth cats, leopards, and hyenas lived there too. These predators might have brought P. robustus bodies into the caves where their fossils were found.
Taxonomy
Research history
Discovery
In 1938, a schoolboy in South Africa found the first pieces of a very old human-like being. He gave them to a scientist who passed them to another scientist, Robert Broom. Broom started looking at the spot where they were found and soon found more pieces, including parts of arm bones and a toe bone. He noticed these pieces were much stronger than other early human relatives he had seen. Broom decided to call this new group Paranthropus robustus. The name Paranthropus means “beside humans” in old Greek.
At the same time, another scientist, Raymond Dart, had found an even earlier human relative called Australopithecus africanus in South Africa. Broom also found other similar fossils in nearby caves. He thought these showed that many different kinds of early human relatives lived together a long time ago.
"P. crassidens"
Later in 1948, Broom found more fossils in a different cave close by. He thought these were a different kind of early human relative and called them P. crassidens. Scientists argued about whether these were really different or just variations of the same group. Over time, most scientists decided that P. crassidens was probably the same as P. robustus.
Gigantopithecus
Broom also thought P. robustus might be related to a huge, ancient ape called Gigantopithecus found in Asia. But later studies showed Gigantopithecus was actually a type of orangutan, not a human relative.
P. boisei
In 1959, scientists found an even stronger type of early human relative in East Africa, called P. boisei. Later discoveries showed that P. boisei lived at the same time as an early human ancestor called Homo erectus. Scientists still discuss how these groups are related and which came first.
Classification
The group Paranthropus now includes P. robustus, P. boisei, and P. aethiopicus. Scientists are not sure if these all belong together in one group or if they should be separated. Because we have only found a few bones, it is hard to know exactly how they are related. Some scientists think P. aethiopicus was the ancestor of P. boisei, while P. robustus came from an earlier branch. In 2023, scientists found very old genetic material from teeth of P. robustus, the oldest human genetic material ever found.
Anatomy
Head
Skull
P. robustus had very large cheek teeth but smaller front teeth, like other Paranthropus species. The premolars looked like molars, and the enamel on the cheek teeth was thick, like in modern humans. Males had a tall face with a bony ridge on the top of the skull and big cheekbones, which helped with strong biting. The cheeks stuck out so much that the nose looked like it was in a dip when viewed from above. The lower jaw was tall, which helped with powerful biting.
The female skull DNH-7 did not have the same strong features as the males, suggesting males were more heavily built. The Drimolen fossils were more lightly built and probably had a weaker bite than the fossils from Swartkrans and Kromdraii. Their brows were rounded.
The inner ear of P. robustus was different from that of apes or humans, suggesting different ways of moving and balancing.
Brain
Early guesses about the brain size of P. robustus varied a lot. Later studies suggested it might have been smaller. In 2020, a nearly complete skull was measured to have a brain volume of about 450 cc.
Blood vessels
Studies of the blood vessels in P. robustus skulls showed some differences from earlier hominins and modern humans.
Torso
Few spine bones are known for P. robustus. The known spine bones show some similarities to both humans and other apes. The pelvis was similar to that of other early hominins but had some features that suggest it was used for walking on two legs.
Limbs
The arm bones of P. robustus were similar in size to both humans and chimpanzees. The wrist could move like a human’s but had some features that might suggest some climbing. The hand bones were like humans’, with strong muscles for gripping.
The leg bones suggest P. robustus walked in a way that was a bit different from modern humans. The hip joint showed signs of strong walking but also some climbing. The knee and foot bones show a mix of features from humans and apes, suggesting P. robustus could walk and possibly climb trees.
Size
Early guesses about the size of P. robustus varied widely. Later studies suggested they were lighter, around 30–43 kg (66–95 lb), with males generally larger than females.
Palaeobiology
Diet
In 1954, scientists thought the strong build of P. robustus and its powerful bite helped them eat hard foods like nuts. Later studies looked at face muscles, tooth wear, and compared them to other animals. In 1981, a scientist studied P. boisei skulls and thought their strong build let them chew a lot of food at once. He saw tooth wear similar to modern monkeys and apes.
In 2004, scientists concluded that Paranthropus ate many kinds of food. They thought P. robustus ate a mix of foods. Tooth wear suggested hard foods were not eaten often, and the strong skull helped when eating foods they did not prefer. This is like modern gorillas, which can eat lower-quality foods all year. In 2005, Greg Laden and Richard Wrangham suggested Paranthropus may have eaten underground plants like roots and tubers, which could explain their strong teeth.
A 2006 study suggested that P. robustus ate plants from both savannas and forests, depending on the season. They may have cracked hard foods like seeds or nuts sometimes. A high rate of cavities could mean they ate honey. Young P. robustus may have eaten more tubers than adults. Wear on baby teeth could mean they ate more gritty foods or had trouble cleaning food from their teeth.
Social structure
Because males and females were very different in size, some scientists think P. robustus may have lived in groups where males were larger and more dominant. In 2007, a scientist suggested that the size difference between males and females was similar to modern gorillas, where one male leads a group of females. However, studies in 2011 and 2016 suggested that females may have left their birth groups more often than males, making a gorilla-like society less likely. If P. robustus lived in open areas, having multiple males in a group may have helped protect them from predators, similar to modern baboons.
In 2017, a scientist suggested that the large crests on male skulls might have been used for showing off, similar to how male gorillas and orangutans use their features to attract mates or show strength. This is different from other animals that show off by flashing their teeth, which Paranthropus likely did not do because their teeth were smaller.
Technology
Cave sites where P. robustus lived often had tools made from bone, while tools made from stone were linked to early Homo. The first possible bone tool was found in 1959. Later digs found more bone tools, usually next to stone tools made by early Homo. These bone tools might have been used to cut plants, process fruits, strip bark from trees, or dig up tubers and insects. The teeth of P. robustus suggest they didn’t need to bite large pieces of food often, maybe because they used tools to prepare food.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, studies of bones from Swartkrans Cave found that some had been burned, suggesting fire may have been used regularly. However, it’s also possible these bones were burned naturally in wildfires and later washed into the cave. The earliest clear evidence of fire use dates to 1.7 million years ago at Wonderwerk Cave, linked to H. ergaster/H. erectus.
Development
Australopithecines, including P. robustus, are thought to have grown faster than modern humans, based on how their teeth developed. The first permanent molar in P. robustus may have appeared between 2.9 to 3.2 years old. While growing, the front of the jaw in P. robustus grew wider, unlike in modern humans where the jaw stays flatter. By the time the first molar came in, the jaw and teeth had grown a lot, making it very strong. Females may have reached full size when their third molar came in, but males kept growing bigger afterward.
Life history
Studies of teeth suggest that P. robustus lived about 17 to 35 years on average. Some scientists think they reached maturity around 11 years old, similar to a middle point between chimpanzees and humans. Estimates based on body size suggest they were born after about 7.6 months of pregnancy, weaned around 2.5 years, reached maturity at 9.7 years, started breeding at 11.4 years, had babies every 45 months, and lived up to about 43 years. These estimates are similar to other australopithecines and chimpanzees, but differ from modern humans.
Pathology
Studies of teeth from P. robustus show they had fewer tooth repairs from wear or cavities compared to modern chimpanzees and gorillas, but more than other australopithecines. Many had spots where enamel didn’t form properly, which might have been a genetic condition. Some had cavities, which is surprising because their diet likely included gritty foods that usually prevent cavities. They also showed signs of gum disease and bone loss around the teeth, possibly due to different diets or chewing habits compared to other australopithecines.
Palaeoecology
The Cradle of Humankind when Paranthropus robustus lived had many animals, like springbok, giraffes, and elephants. There were also big cats such as sabertoothed cats like Dinofelis and Megantereon, plus hyenas.
Paranthropus robustus lived with other early humans such as Homo ergaster/Homo erectus and Australopithecus sediba. These species shared the same area, though scientists are not sure how they interacted. The land was a mix of open fields and wooded spots, and it was cooler than when later humans lived.
Fossil-bearing deposits
Location of the Cradle of Humankind
Fossil-bearing caves (P. robustus is known from 1, 7, and 11–14)
Swartkrans
At Swartkrans, P. robustus fossils were found in Members 1–3. Over 300 P. robustus specimens, mostly teeth, have been found here. Homo species were also there, but it is not clear which ones.
Sterkfontein
At Sterkfontein, only two specimens are known to be P. robustus. These are from a layer that is between 2 and 1.7 million years old. Earlier layers had Australopithecus africanus. Some scientists think an older specimen could be an ancestor to P. robustus.
Kromdraai
At Kromdraai, P. robustus fossils were found mostly in Member 3. About 31 specimens from at least 17 individuals have been found. The fossils here may be older than those from other places.
Gondolin Cave
Gondolin Cave has found three hominin specimens. One is from early Homo, another is a gracile australopithecine, and the third is a robust australopithecine tooth. This tooth is very large, almost as big as those from another robust species.
Cooper's Cave
Cooper's Cave was first reported to have P. robustus remains in 2000. The fossils include a crushed face, teeth, and skull pieces. The animal remains found here are similar to those at Swartkrans and Kromdraai.
Drimolen Cave
Drimolen Cave was first found to have hominin remains in 1992. It has produced 79 P. robustus specimens, including some of the most complete skulls. The site is thought to be between 2 and 1.5 million years old.
Predation
Australopithecine bones in caves may have been brought there by big carnivores. A juvenile P. robustus skull shows marks that look like they were made by a leopard's teeth. Scientists think leopards, sabertoothed cats, and hyenas may have hunted these early humans. Today, baboons stay near larger animals to stay safe, and early humans might have done the same.
Extinction
P. robustus liked wooded areas and lived during a wet time in South Africa. As the climate changed and dry times became longer, these wooded areas got smaller. This may have caused the extinction of P. robustus, which disappeared around 1 to 0.6 million years ago. Early Homo species may have survived because they lived over a larger area and could find safer places during hard times.
Images
Related articles
This article is a child-friendly adaptation of the Wikipedia article on Paranthropus robustus, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Images from Wikimedia Commons. Tap any image to view credits and license.
Safekipedia